Immanuel Kant Essay Example for Free

Immanuel Kant EssayDeontological Theory The deontological scheme declare that the consequences or outcomes of actions are not important, what actually matter is that the actions are morally justified. For example drunken impetuous is wrong, now if a person argues that he safely navigated his way back home and for that reason he/she should not be held accountable by law, they are wrong beca hire their action was wrong in the first base place and was breaking the basic principle for morally correct behaviour that a person should not drive while be drunk. The contribution of Immanuel Kant towards development of Deontological theory Immanuel Kant proposes that in taking a purpose Duty carries the fore or so importance. Kant is of the view that a persons actions allow only be regarded as morally and ethically correct when they are taken keeping in mind the sense of calling and responsibility in mind. Teleological Ethical Theory The teleological ethical theory put the basal fo cus on the Consequences i. e. What are those actions that produce the best possible results?Along with attaching importance to the consequences the teleological theory also suggests that the decisions framework that is developed for achieving the desired consequences should also be managed with care. Consequentialist Theory harmonize to the Consequentiality Theory, the nates for determining how moral a persons actions are the consequences. The consequences of actions raft be good or naughtiness, and they can be damaging or favourable. The contribution of Jeremy Bentham towards development of a persons actions can be a classified as good or bad depending on what consequences the action has produced.According to Benthams opinion the good things are classified as pleasure and the bad ones as cark.1. 2 Absolute ethics has only two sides both(prenominal)thing is good or bad, black or white. Some examples in police ethics would be unethical behaviours such as bribery, extortion, exce ssive force, and perjury, which nearly e reallyone would chequer are unacceptable behaviours by the police. Relative ethics is more complicated and can have a multitude of sides with varying shades of gray. What is bowl overed ethical behaviour by one person may be deemed highly unethical by nearlyone else.The Absolutist theory is the theory that certain things are reclaim or wrong from an objective point of view and cannot change according to culture. Certain actions are in and of itself right or wrong, which means they are right or wrong in themselves. This is also cognise as deontological. The relativist theory is the theory that in that respect are no universally valid moral principles. completely principles and set are relative to a particular culture or age. Ethical relativism means that there is no such thing as good in itself, but if and action seems good to you and bad to me, that is it, and there is no objective basis for us to discover the truth.This theory is al so known as teleological. An example of an absolutist ethical system would be if a single mother with a very young child had no money and therefore no food to feed the child, and she stole some food from the shop and the mother was caught and had a trial, an absolutist would argue that its morally wrong to steal and should beget the consequences of the crime. They dont take into account the situation the person might be in and use an absolute law. However, this is in contrast to the alternative ethical system, called relativist, because this system is really the complete opposite.Again Ill use the same example as I did for absolutist. If a relativist was looking at this they would take into favor the situation the woman might be in and empathize with her and try to find an outcome that is the most fair. One reason to support the absolutist approach as the only defensible approach is that it provides acknowledgment for acting which means that morality seems to demand some sort of obligation. If theres a fix moral code then there is no obligation to act in a way. other strength is that it gives clear guidelines, which basically means the rules are fixed and clear to apply. 1. 3 Ethics refers to a prescribed or accepted code of conduct. Ethical issues are a set of moral values that need to be addressed while carrying out worry. business sectores operate in a society that is incorporated around moral values.Therefore, when conducting its operations, a business has certain responsibilities which are to provide the society with quality goods and run that will improve the peoples living standards. In high society to survive, a business take to maintain its customers. Product packaging is one way of ensuring a business maintains its existing customers and also grasp new customers.Some companies are known to allow underweight packaging of products which are then highly priced and this is a rude way of increasing profits. However this negative trend will affe ct the business in the long run as customers will eventually come to learn that they are being swindled. In an attempt to boost sales, some businessmen adapt promotional methods that mislead customers as the communicate conveyed may not give the exact details of the product. Businesses should desist from increasing prices without valid reasons. In doing so, they will be taking advantage of the customer and this is unethical.Businessmen should also desist from taking part in corrupt practices such as selling low standard goods while bribing government officials in order to continue operating. Entrepreneurs should consider the effects of their activities on the society they serve. In the long run, wrong dealings and turpitude will tarnish the image of the business and have a negative effect on sales. Business people ought to comply with the law requirements and observe laid down principles of morality in their dealings. They should seriously consider expectations of the community th ey serve. (http//www. lawrencegmcdonald. com).