Persuasive Paper: The Crucible Essay

originThose who nooky non learn from write up are damned to ring it. The violent encounters of the by erstwhile(prenominal) read valuable lessons some resolving conflict.            The happenings of the gones are significant to any(prenominal) events occurring at any point in the throw. From the fundamental ideology that prehistoric acting as blocks, the actions, decisions and every participating events that seduce occurred in the olden predetermine the possibilities of the lay, and finally the future. In the movie, The Crucible (1953) written by Arthur Miller, the correlations of past events with the happenings of the present are largely illustrated. In different points of view, troika funny angles of issues are considered the primary subjects relating to the repeats of past and the sorrows of resolving the repeated conflict.For prat Proctor, the native Australian Salem farmer, he is confronted by the issues of affair with his previous maid, and insult issues with his current. Meanwhile, Abigail Williams, the niece of the Reverend, has experienced being confronted by her affections and emotional attachments that damaged one birth however, afterward the attendant in the past, it has now grown capable of damaging the partnership. Lastly, Elizabeth Proctor, the wife of John Proctor, has been confronted by faith issues towards her conserve in the early move of the movie, which eventually evolved in trust conflicts that guide to the lost of her loved one. watchwordPersuasive Arguments            The three primary characters of the movie are the best representative of certain individuals who fail to learn from their pasts and unconsciously repeat the similar instance, further still end up being trapped within its lairs. In the story of crucible, the plot of has revolved in a last mentioned chivalrous setting wherein a familiarity happens to fa ll in the social revere towards the spreading news of witchcraft. It has been initiated by a group of locals headed by Abigail Williams who happened to constitute illness towards the daughter of Reverend Samuel Parris, Betty Parris.In such event, the Reverend, being implicated to his reputation than his sick daughter, has initiated the wide search against the corruptions of these so-called witches. The hunt and effectual trials have all revolved in the fraud manipulation and lies brought by Abigail, which in the end corrupted various innocents of their residential district, including the couple, John Proctor and Elizabeth.            commencement with John Proctor, his character in the movie possesses the pride of being a Salem native and the attitude of a hard-working husband. However, his past has revolved in the issue of having an affair with his former maid, Abigail. Markedly in the act 1, Abigail tries to decoy and brings fann y the events of her past with John Proctor,            I cannot sleep for conceive ofin I cannot dream but I wake and walk about the house          as though Id find you comin through some opening (Act 1). However, John denies any attraction towards her and points out that the issue of their affair should not come out to the public. Such scenario illustrates the historical mistake of Proctor, particularly in abusing his authority towards his servant. Hence, the past of Proctor is able to catch up to his present in latter(prenominal) portion of the story. Abigail has brought the name of his wife, Elizabeth, to the courtroom and branded her as one of the witches.Meanwhile, prior to the incidents of his commencement ceremony mistake with Abigail, he is still inefficient to learn from the conflicts produced by his abuse of authority hence, he repeats the abuse of spring towards his servant Mary warren. Due to Johns failure of realizing the conflicts brought by his history with Abigail, his encounter with Mary has brought him within the walls when Mary branded him as the warlock who manipulated her thoughts in order to falsely accuse the locals. In the end, since Proctor is not able to learn his lessons in maltreating his first servant, the repetition of the history has brought him a more violent consequence, which leads to his death trail.            Meanwhile, Abigail is also confronted by the same incidents of restate history and the failure of comprehending the consequences of her action. In the story, Abigail is considered the manipulative character able to tempt the manhood of Proctor hence, leading to their illegal affair. After Elizabeth discovered the affair, she decides to mail out Abigail resigning her from her servitude. In defense to her soiled name and humiliated figure, she brags about Elizabeths dominative treatment to wards her. However, due to the incident, Abigail has considerable ruined the marital relationship between John and Elizabeth, especially considering the status of Elizabeths trust towards her husband after the incident.Despite of the trouble she has implicated to the couple, Abigail still pursues her ambition of obtaining back Proctor, and in her preferred process, she has enticed the public with her lies and accusations of witchcraft to various women within their community including Elizabeth. During the second repetition of her conflict, Abigail now damages the lives of various women in her community (i.e. Mary warren, Sarah Good, Goody Osborne). In the case of the couples relationship, Abigails lies and enticement have caused further dilemma to both Elizabeth and John by having them imprisoned and branded as witches.            Lastly, Elizabeth Proctor, being the faithful and loving wife of John Proctor, has been confronted by her tru st issues towards her husband after discovering Johns affair with Abigail. In the Act II, Elizabeth has manifested her anxiety and paranoia on the possible repetition of mistake that his husband did with their former servant. After the first incident, Elizabeth finds it hard to trust her husband and most of the age suspects him of being with Abigail. Such conflict has first resulted to the argument of the couple.However, during the second time Elizabeths trust to her husband is tried in Act III, Elizabeth is not able to comprehend and trust the protrudes of his husband. When John decides to assert the claims of his affair with Abigail in order to break the hold of Abigail to the courtroom, Elizabeth is asked to formalise the statements of her husband however, due to the conflicts of trust, and fear of tarnishing the name and pride of Salem community and her husband, she decides to deny the claims made by John. In this second encounter, the consequences have led their relationship to further shatter leaving them both separated by prison walls and the accusations of witchcraft practice made by Mary warfareren against John Proctor and Abigail Williams against Elizabeth Proctor.            Evidently in the movie, the three characters have shown how history can repeat itself and further causes heightened impact during its second occurrence. Since the lessons in their pasts have been neglected, the repetitions of the conflicts have placed their present in heavier consequences.Personal Perspective            From the latter analysis of the concept through the movie The Crucible, it is possible to conclude the philosophical truth in the initial statement, those who cannot learn from history are doomed to repeat it. In fact, the tragedies of the story have revolved in constant successions of their role conflicts, particularly (1) John Proctors failure of recognizing his maltrea tment actions over his subordinates, (2) Abigail Williams failure to realize the damages she have been implicating towards the coupe and eventually towards her community, and (3) Elizabeth Proctors trust issues towards her once unfaithful husband. Evidenced by the conflicts and tragedies of the story, the failure of actually realizing the decisions and activities that led to particular events possess greater contingency of occurrence in the future.            Even in real life situations, from bigger perspectives of society to personal experiences, negative events in the past most of the time occur in the present, especially when the primary cause/s of the paradox is/are not determined. Learning from the events of the past is an essential preventive confinement in order to avoid the possibility of repeating the mistakes and wrong decisions created in the past.Some of the famous events that illustrate repetitive history due to the failur e of undermining the triggers of these mistakes are (1) the events of World War I and its sequel World War II, (2) Racial civilian war of sorrys and Whites leading to wide factional stereotypes which should have been decided if the people in the past realized the indifferences only of skin and culture, (3) the bombarding of free fall harbor to the deadly Hiroshima Bombing which should have been prevented if Japanese realize that the intents of the beading Harbor camp were not against the Japanese country.            Evidently, the statement, the violent encounters of the past contain valuable lessons about resolving the conflict, can be considered a factual justification supporting the initial sentence discussed in latter portion. The happenings of the present largely depend on what has actually occurred in the past hence, without realizing the lesions, the possible causes of mistakes, the triggers of downfall, and the fundamental wr ong of acts in the past, the events of the past tend to repeat itself. Clearly, every happening in the past provide significant lessons, which can expose itself either directly or indirectly, and it is only up to military personnel to determine these potential resolutions.From the examples given in real-time setting, (1) World War II should have been prevented if the Japanese learned the powers of United States (2) the Racial Civil war between Blacks and Whites should have been prevented if Whites did provide equal treatment towards Black people and based their judgment in the principles of humanity not in the color of the skin (3) Hiroshima Bombing should have been prevented if Japanese troops had not bombarded the pearl harbor base camps just because of an assumption of possible plan of attack plotted within the camp.            Evidently, resolutions are presented every time an incident or even when a round-eyed outcome of decision o ccurs. From simple mistakes to larger scope of damages, resolutions are always born from decision that initiates an effect. From three different perspectives, the characters of John Proctor, Abigail Williams and Elizabeth Proctor, have performed actions in the past, which eventually hunted their present days.