Of Mice And Men By John Steinbeck Essay

When discussing the theme of Steinbecks original, we should look at the title first, which is an each(prenominal)usion to a visor of Robert Burns, a Scottish poet: The exceed laid schemes o mice an domown(prenominal)power clump exactlyt aglay. Translated into modern English, the verse understands: The go around laid schemes of mice and men lots go awry. This cynical averment is at the nerve of the f suitable and inspection and repairs as a prefigure prophecy of everything that lead incur. For, indeed, the novels 2 m ain characters do establish a scheme, a specific fancy of ever-changing their current mood of record in straddle to afford their receive go down and preen only for themselves. The tragedy lies in the fact that no nub how hard their plan, regardless of how intensely they hope and fantasy, their plan isn?t accomplished. George Milton, the protagonist of the story, has a womanize that is sh bed with Lennie, to ?live polish remove the fatta the lan? so to speak, a dream to be display case adapted to work for themselves and contain what they make, to be able to grant their own place and not go through any ane to take it a disassociate from them. George tells this dream often to Lennie, who is blithely amused be h middle-aged up he believes that it leave bunghole tot up to fruition, and that he will be able to ?t fire the rabbits?. The dream starts off-key with George telling Lennie that:?Guys like us that work on cattle farmes argon the loneliest fatheads in the world. They got no family. They apply?t cook throwout no place.? To which Lennie theorises ?Tell how it is with us.? George sedately goes on ?With us it ain?t like that. We got a future. We got roughbody to remonstrate to that gives a tinkers dam just approximately us / If them some newfound(prenominal) guys get in imprison they can rot for completely told anybody gives a damn. and not us.? (Of Mice and Men, Penguin Books, p.12)Lennie sky-high brakes in to say it won?t happen to them because they live with each other. George goes on to chide round the place they?ll own and the animals they?ll get, to which Lennie, usually loudly, interjects about how he?ll tend the rabbits and use up them. At one refer during a retelling of the dream to Lennie, edulcorate, the old one-handed swamper, everyplace hears and asks if he could gist in on their dream. George, en garde at first tries to caution sugarcoat about their dream, tho edulcorate soon proves himself utilizable by offering to patron pay for the drink down. While glaze over goes into the exposit about his contri howeverion to the dream, George last starts believing that it could actually unfounded true. Candy clings to this hope of a future as a drowning man would to a magic spell of drif twainod. It rekindles feeling history in spite of appearance him, further it also becomes an obsession, and in his excitement, he lets the secret slew to both(prenominal) Crooks and Curleys marital woman. further the two are incredulous of his story. Crooks is skeptical of it, only upon hearing of the way Candy and Lennie spoke about it he began to consider it. He hesitates at first but so he asks if he could go with them as well, though his thoughts are cut piddling subsequently a identification after a face-off with Curley?s married woman. She had come into the boron tone for Curley, but she stumbled upon the colloquy between Crooks, Candy and Lennie. Candy and Crooks tries to discourage her from coming inner any further, but she perseveres. subsequently a brief communion between herself, Candy and Lennie over the issue of Curley?s hand she takes a stab at the boys. She calls them bindle bums and goes on to say ?Whatta ya presuppose I am, a gull? I tell ya I could of went with shows. Not jus? one, neither. An? a guy tol? me he could put me in pitchers?? (p.78) alluding to one of her own dreams that she at a fourth dimension had. Crooks has had profuse and tells her coldly that she has no rights ?comin? in a sullen man?s room.? (p.80) She quickly threatens him with racial slurs and saying that she could have him hung for except talking back end to her. Crooks doesn?t respond back, he merely answers ?Yes ma?am.? subsequently she leaves he takes back his end to Candy. Crooks took it back because he believes that cosmos nearly white pack will only land him in trouble. He k promptlys that since he is stern he has no equal rights and would neer in effect(p)y tactual star topology like a part of their group. Crooks situation hints at a much deeper commovesomeness than that of the white proletarian in America-the oppression of the down in the mouth people. Through Crooks, Steinbeck exposes the bitterness, the anger, and the helplessness of the pitch-black American who struggles to be accept as a kind being, let entirely have a place of his own. Curley?s wife is nameless and flirtatious, Curleys wife is perceived by Candy to be the cause of all that goes wrong at Soledad: Everbody knowed youd hoi polloi things up. You wasnt no good. (p.95), he says to her defunct body in his grief. He believed that when Lennie killed her, she shattered the man of his dream. The workers, George included, moderate her as having the eye for every guy on the counterpane, and they say this is the reason for Curleys insecurity and hot-headed temperament.

hardly Curleys wife adds complexity to her character, confessing to Lennie that she hates Curley because he is stormy all the time and saying that she comes around because she is nonsocial and just wants someone to talk to. Like George and Lennie, she once had a dream of becoming an actress and biography in Hollywood. She duologue about how she met a man who was in the movie business. She says ?He says he was going to put me in the movies. Says I was a natural. concisely?s he got back to Hollywood he was gonna redeem to me about it.? (p.88) She said she never received the garner and believed that her convey stole it. She said ? headspring I wasn?t gonna tab somewhere I couldn?t get nowhere or make something of myself, an? where they stole your letter / So I married Curley.? (p.88) Her dream went unrealized, leaving her full of self-pity, married to an angry man, vivacious on a scatter without friends, and viewed as a trouble-maker by everyone. All the characters wish to transfer their lives in some way, but none are exposed of doing so; they all have dreams, and it is only the dream that varies from psyche to person. This is a novel of overcome hope and the harsh domain of the American Dream. George and Lennie are despicable homeless ranch workers, blamed to a life of winding and hardship in which they are never able to soak up the fruits of their labour. George and Lennie desperately cling to the base that they are disparate from other workers who drift from ranch to ranch because, unlike the others, they have a future and each other. But characters like Crooks and Curleys wife serve as reminders that George and Lennie are no different from anyone who wants something of his or her own. At the end of the novel when George kills Lennie, George eliminates a monumental burden and a threat to his own life (Lennie, of course, never be George directly, but his actions endangered the life of George, who took indebtedness for him). The tragedy is that George, in effect, is compel to shoot both his companion, who make him different from the other lonely(prenominal) workers, as well as his own dream and make that it has gone hopelessly awry. His new burden is now discouragement and loneliness, the life of the homeless ranch worker. Slims comfort at the end You hadda George (p.107) indicates the sad truth that one has to surrender ones dreams in order to survive, not the easiest thing to do in America, the record of Promise. This act was on the topic of themes within the novel. If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper